Legal Opinion
Dunning v. United States
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided August 20, 1964No. 13920-1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.
This action for a refund of income taxes paid was instituted pursuant to Section 1346(a) (1) of Title 28 United States Code. Full cooperative utilization of pretrial procedures enabled the parties to stipulate all the relevant facts. We state and paraphrase particular facts from that stipulation in order to place the questions for decision and the contentions of the parties in perspective. We, of course, find all the facts as stipulated.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Missouri Public Service Company was incorporated as a Missouri corporation on November 29, 1926. On February…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Helvering v. Alabama Asphaltic Limestone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Helvering v. Southwest Consolidated Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Helvering v. Cement Investors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SansomeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meyer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
- Highland Supply Corporation v. Reynolds Metals CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1965
- John E. McCullough and Esther D. McCullough v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Banister v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1964
- Richard H. Dunning and Beulah Marie Dunning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.