John E. McCullough and Esther D. McCullough v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
COLLINS, Judge.
This is an action for the refund of Federal income tax. Plaintiffs were the owners of shares of common stock in the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company (hereinafter referred to as “Frisco”). During the years in question, 1957 and 1958, plaintiffs received from the Frisco distributions of $187.50 and $25, respectively. The distributions were treated in plaintiffs’ (joint) Federal income tax returns as dividend income. The basis for this action is plaintiffs’ assertion now that, in part, the distributions did not represent dividend income, but were, in part, a return of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Helvering v. Alabama Asphaltic Limestone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Helvering v. Cement Investors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SansomeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Commissioner v. PhippsSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Charles KavanaghCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harper v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1973
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- John W. Bennett, Jr. And Mary Bennett v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Daytona Beach Kennel Club, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
- Richard H. Dunning and Beulah Marie Dunning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.