United States v. Anthony Scott Drake
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must reconcile an apparent conflict between a mandatory minimum sentence statute and the United States Sentencing Guidelines provisions for concurrent sentencing.
I
In a state proceeding, Anthony Drake was sentenced to sixty-six months in an Oregon prison for his participation in an armed robbery in which a .380 SPP semi-automatic handgun was used.
Shortly after Drake began serving his state sentence, a federal grand jury indicted him on two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Drake ultimately pled guilty to possession' of the handgun used in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. KieferCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
3Cited by36 opinions
- Francisco Rios v. Ron Wiley, Warden, Fpc-Allenwood Ron WileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Nicholas J. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald William KIMBLE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Schleining v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Lopez v. TerrellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.