Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Scott Drake

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1995No. 94-30209PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must reconcile an apparent conflict between a mandatory minimum sentence statute and the United States Sentencing Guidelines provisions for concurrent sentencing.

I

In a state proceeding, Anthony Drake was sentenced to sixty-six months in an Oregon prison for his participation in an armed robbery in which a .380 SPP semi-automatic handgun was used.

Shortly after Drake began serving his state sentence, a federal grand jury indicted him on two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Drake ultimately pled guilty to possession' of the handgun used in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. KieferCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Francisco Rios v. Ron Wiley, Warden, Fpc-Allenwood Ron WileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Nicholas J. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald William KIMBLE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Schleining v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Lopez v. TerrellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API