Legal Opinion

Nevada v. Jackson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 3, 2013No. 12–694PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

*506In this case, the Court of Appeals held that respondent, who was convicted of rape and other serious crimes, is entitled to relief under the federal habeas statute because the Supreme Court of Nevada unreasonably applied clearly established Supreme Court precedent regarding a criminal defendant's constitutional right to present a defense. At his trial, respondent unsuccessfully sought to introduce evidence for the purpose of showing that the *1991rape victim previously reported that he had assaulted her but that the police had been unable to substantiate those allegations. The state supreme court…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jay Scott Clark v. Noah NagyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API