Legal Opinion

Denman v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided July 26, 2006No. 01-05-00454-CRPublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SAM NUCHIA, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Jarvis Dewayne Denman, guilty of aggravated assault and assessed punishment at 13 years. Appellant presents four issues on appeal: (1) the evidence is legally insufficient to support the conviction; (2) the evidence was factually insufficient to support the conviction; (3) the trial court erred in not including an application paragraph in the jury charge on the defense of self-defense with non-deadly force under section 9.31 of the Penal Code 1 ; and (4) trial counsel was ineffective because he elicited appellant’s prior felony convictions on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  2. Phillip Bundy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  3. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Huerta v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  5. Kenneth Ramone Dearborn, II v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API