United States v. Brighton Building & Maintenance Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FLAUM, District Judge:
The instant indictment, charging nine corporations and two individuals, arises out of an alleged bid-rigging scheme involving highway construction on Federal Interstate Route 55. Count 1 charges that the defendants, acting in concert, conspired to rig the bidding on certain contracts offered by the State of Illinois in violation of the Sherman Act § 1,15 U.S.C. § 1. Counts 2 through 38 allege that the defendants conspired to defraud the State of Illinois by submitting rigged bids and that in furtherance of this scheme the defendants used the United…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Steven Menzies v. Seyfarth Shaw LLPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. HubbardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- United States v. Charles L. Rodgers, Anthony J. Bertucci Construction Co., Inc., Mack A. Mathis, Alois Luhr and Luhr Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Climatemp, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- United States v. VastolaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.