Legal Opinion

Med James, Inc. v. Barnes

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 10, 2003No. 88,194PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

This case involves an action seeking recovery of money damages that Med James, Inc. (Med James) claims to have lost as a result of Donald Barnes, d/b/a Ekberg Insurance Agency, failing to properly prepare an insurance application. Med James appeals the district court’s award of summary judgment in favor of Barnes. Med James contends its action is not barred by the 2-year statute of limitations, that the district court should not have considered Barnes’ motion for summary judgment due to deficiencies in procedural compliance, that Med James’ action was not barred by the “one-trial”…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Glenn v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Friends University v. W. R. Grace & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  5. Barbara Oil Co. v. Kansas Gas Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Linerboard Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Hauptman v. WMC, INC.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  3. Ives v. McGannonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  4. Safeway, Inc. v. Rooter 2000 Plumbing & Drain SSSNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Kelvin Manbodh Asbestos Litigation Series v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API