Legal Opinion

Hudson v. McNear

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 22, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Exceptions by defendant. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

This case comes up on exceptions to the allowance of an amendment to the plaintiffs declarations in his writ. The declaration contained three counts; one in assumpsit, one in debt on judgment and one in assumpsit on a promissory note. The defendant filed a special demurrer for misjoinder. The demurrer was sustained and the plaintiff allowed to amend; first, by striking out the first count in assumpsit; second, by striking out in the third count the words, “by reason and in consideration whereof the said defendant become liable and promised the plaintiff to pay him the contents of said note…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The AriadneSupreme Court of the United States · 1817

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gordon v. LeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
  2. Champlin v. RyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API