Legal Opinion
Nexsen v. Haddock
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided December 19, 2002No. 3581PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CURETON, J.:
David Nexsen brought this action seeking a declaration that the sublease between Kenneth E. McClary, James G. Lifrage and Marion Driggers is a nullity pursuant to S.C.Code Ann. § 27-35-60 (1976, as amended). The trial judge found the sublease to be invalid. Lifrage and Driggers appeal. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1996, David Nexsen purchased a tract of land on the Black River in Williamsburg County, South Carolina. At the time the property was purchased, the tract had been divided into three lots, with each lot being subject to a lease. Kenneth E. McClary was a tenant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Hitachi Data Systems Corp. v. LeathermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Burns v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- WDW PROPERTIES v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Dobyns v. South Carolina Department of Parks, Recreation & TourismSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schnellmann v. RoettgerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Spence Ex Rel. Estate of Spence v. WingateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Plantation A.D., LLC v. Gerald Builders of Conway, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Spence v. WingateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Hancock v. Mid-South Management, Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.