Legal Opinion

In re Supreme Court Vacancy

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1894PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of Corson and Kellam, JJ., in anawer to certain questions propounded by Hon. Charles H. Sheldon, governor, as provided by Const. Art. 5, § 13.

To His Excellency, Charles H. Sheldon, Governor of the State of South Dakota:

Sir: We have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your communication under'date of January 11, 1894, in which, under the provisions of Section 13, Art. 5, of the state constitution, you propound to us certain questions for our consideration as follows: “First. Is there a vacancy upon the supreme bench of this state, as contemplated in the constitution? Second. If so,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Stocking v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  3. People v. TiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. State ex rel. Tredway v. LuskSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  5. State ex rel. McGee v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cummings v. MickelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Rearick v. Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. In re Opinion of the JudgesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State v. HartSuperior Court of Delaware · 1925
  5. State ex rel. Holmes v. FinnerudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API