Legal Opinion
Hardenbrook v. Combs
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.
The Steuben county commissioner of public welfare, herein referred to as the Steuben commissioner, seeks an order of mandamus requiring the Broome county commissioner of public welfare, herein called the Broome commissioner, to pay the amount expended by the former in the care of one Allen Hall and family.
Not knowing whether the city of Binghamton was a separate welfare district, the welfare commissioner of said city was made a party. It is not a separate district and has been stipulated out of this proceeding.
*548The New York State Department of Social Welfare, herein called the State…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. KirbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Matter of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Fallon v. HattemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Matter of Ottinger v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- New York State Employees' Retirement System v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Revona Realty Corp. v. WassermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957