Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Dietzman

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1990No. 71052PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Art. 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to 20 years imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed on appeal. Dietzman v. State, 613 S.W.2d 300 (1981).

Applicant contends that he is entitled to an out-of-time appeal because he received ineffective assistance on appeal. The Court of Appeals held that in the first 16 grounds of error raised on appeal, applicant challenged admissibility of a written and oral confession. At the motion to suppress hearing, the court considered testimony…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hagens v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. Ex Parte CoyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Ex Parte DietzmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Adedayo Taiwo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  5. Cash, Ex Parte Rodney KeithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API