Legal Opinion

Cash, Ex Parte Rodney Keith

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 2005No. AP-75,108Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-75,108

EX PARTE RODNEY KEITH CASH, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Holcomb, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Price, Womack, and Johnson J.J. joined.

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N

I respectfully dissent. The majority denies habeas relief because applicant did not show that he was prejudiced under the second prong of Strickland. (1) I would hold that applicant met the first prong of Strickland (that trial counsel was deficient) and also its second prong, i.e., "there is a reasonable probability…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API