Legal Opinion

Calvert Insurance v. S & L Realty Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 31, 1996No. 95 Civ. 5725 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Calvert Insurance Co. (“Calvert”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b), to declare that it is not obligated to defend or indemnify Defendants S & L Realty and S & L Management Corp. (collectively, “S & L”) in an underlying personal injury action brought by Defendant Kitoria Washington (“Washington”) against S & L based on Washington’s alleged exposure to chemical fumes or vapors.

For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment will be denied.

Prior Proceedings

Calvert brought this action on August 2, 1995, seeking a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Brady v. Town of ColchesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. Fitzpatrick v. American Honda Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Ruder & Finn Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western Alliance Insurance v. GillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Ducote v. Koch Pipeline Co., LPSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  3. WTC Captive Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API