Legal Opinion
Patterson v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 3, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Sverdrup & Parcel Consultants, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mastro, J.), dated May 26, 2000, which denied its motion to dismiss the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it on the grounds that the complaint failed to state a cause of action and that the action was barred by the Statute of Limitations.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, the motion is granted, and the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against Sverdrup & Parcel…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Blanco v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Claim of McCann v. Walsh Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Claim of McCann v. Walsh Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Martzloff v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Claim of Mustaqur RahmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miniero v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2007
- Huggler v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Chestnut Ridge Air, Ltd. v. 1260269 Ontario Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2006
- O'Donnell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001