Legal Opinion
Chestnut Ridge Air, Ltd. v. 1260269 Ontario Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 2006Published
1Opinion of the Court
*808OPINION OF THE COURT
Rolando T. Acosta, J.
Background
The facts in this case are fairly straightforward. In July 1999, plaintiff Chestnut Ridge Air, Ltd. purchased the aircraft at issue in this case. Corporate Air Management (CAM), a Michigan-based corporation, maintained and managed the aircraft for Chestnut. In August 1999, CAM engaged defendant Sky Harbour, a Canadian corporation, to strip, paint and refinish the aircraft. The work order, which was prepared by Sky Harbour, incorrectly listed CAM as the owner of the aircraft. According to plaintiff and CAM, Sky Harbour knew or should have…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Citigroup Inc. v. City Holding Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. v. Montana Board of InvestmentsNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.