Legal Opinion

Gloyd v. Hotel La Salle Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 16, 1921No. Gen. No. 26,458PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph B. David, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1920.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PresidiNG Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nil capiat en-| tered upon a verdict instructed by the learned trial judge. \

The constitutionality of the so-called “Anti-tipping Statute,”.being sections 560, 561 and 562 of the Criminal Code, Rev. St. 1919 [Callaghan’s 1916 Stat. ¶¶ 3949(l)-3949(3)], is argued.

All statutes are constitutional in this court until pronounced otherwise by our Supreme Court, hut aside from the statute itself, as will hereinafter appear, plaintiff cannot maintain this action.

At the conclusioii of plaintiff’s proofs…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois Glass Co. v. Chicago Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Yates v. Royal InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Goodrich v. TenneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Wakefield v. VanTassellIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Kearney v. WebbIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Townsend v. New York Cent. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  3. Starrett v. PedersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Williams v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API