Legal Opinion

Starrett v. Pedersen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 11, 1936No. 30,952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

Action in replevin brought by plaintiff to recover a quantity of intoxicants seized by defendant in his capacity as sheriff upon the arrest of plaintiff on the charge of unlawfully having intoxicating liquor in his possession for the purpose of sale.

The facts, as found by the lower court, were stipulated. In Chippewa county, one of the so-called dry counties of this state, it was unlawful to have in one’s possession intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale for use as a beverage. See 3 Mason Minn. St. 1934 Sapp. §§ 3200-5, 3200-30, 3200-51. On May 31, 1935, plaintiff was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Lloyd v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Jones v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. State ex rel. Robertson v. New England Furniture & Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Schur v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Duluth v. CervenySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. True v. OlderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API