Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Blaisdell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 28, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On summary investigation of a corporate election.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

This is a summary investigation of a corporate election under section 42 of the Corporation act. The controversy turns on the right to vote two hundred and forty-two shares standing in the name of Albert Rumpel; This right was denied by the inspectors at the election. These shares, if voted, -would have changed the result. Theodore Rumpel sought tó vote them by virtue of a proxy from Albert. It is not denied that Albert appeared as owner on the books of the company on the day of the election, or that the proxy was in proper form and properly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Petition of Argus Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. American National Bank v. Oriental MillsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1891
  3. People ex rel. Israel v. TibbetsNew York Supreme Court · 1825

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
  2. In re Canal Constuction Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
  3. Wick v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API