Sparks v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Judge.
The issue presented in this appeal from' two convictions of obtaining money by false pretenses is whether the trial court erred by admitting into evidence certain bank records under the business records exception to the hearsay rule. Specifically, the question is whether the bank’s vice-president, who had general supervisory authority over bank personnel but no direct supervision over the persons responsible for preparing or maintaining the bank’s records, was a person who could authenticate the bank’s records. We hold that the trial judge did not err by admitting the bank…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hooker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Neeley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- "Automatic" Sprinkler Corp. of America v. Coley & Petersen, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1979
- Ford Motor Co. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Kettler & Scott, Inc. v. Earth Technology CompaniesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Parker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Joseph John Melick v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
- McDowell v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.