Legal Opinion

"Automatic" Sprinkler Corp. of America v. Coley & Petersen, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 12, 1979No. Record 770728PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCompton, J.

This appeal arises from a contract to construct a public facility. Following an incident which resulted in damage to portions of the structure, two subcontractors sued a third subcontractor for recovery of costs and expenses incurred during repair of the damage. Upon review, we consider whether the plaintiffs below had standing to sue, whether contractual waiver provisions barred the plaintiffs’ actions, and whether certain items of damage were properly admitted in evidence.

In 1968, the City of Roanoke entered into a lump sum contract in the amount of $11 million with Nello L. Teer Company,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co. v. Universal Moulded Products Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  2. Allen v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  3. Neeley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
  4. Atlantic & Danville Railway Co. v. Delaware Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  5. French v. Virginian Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Frye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  2. Hooker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  3. Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  4. Robinson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
  5. Marefield Meadows, Inc. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API