Legal Opinion

Pearce v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided January 9, 1998No. A-5915Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

This case presents an unusual issue that arose during jury selection. The selection process was complete, in the sense that the parties had waived their remaining peremptory challenges and had accepted a panel of twelve jurors, but the court adjourned for the evening without requiring the twelve selected jurors to take their trial oath. During this evening adjournment, the defense attorney received new information about one of the jurors. Based on this information, the attorney wished to challenge the juror in question. For this purpose, he asked the trial judge to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grimes v. HaslettAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. GraybillAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Graybill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
  4. Nelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
  5. Ketzler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API