Graybill v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Judge.
Defendants, Ron Garroute, John Graybill, and William Punches, were convicted of numerous fish and game violations stemming from a hunting trip in the vicinity of Illiamna. On appeal, defendants jointly challenge their convictions on several grounds; Graybill, separately contends that his sentence is excessive. We conclude that the issues jointly raised by defendants can be disposed of summarily. 1 However, Graybill’s contention that the sentence imposed by Judge Andrews was excessive requires more extensive consideration.
Defendants are Anchorage residents who flew…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. WorthamAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Donlun v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Alvarado v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Tookak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
- Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GraybillAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
- Maeckle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.