Legal Opinion

Graybill v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided October 28, 1983No. 6744-6746PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

Defendants, Ron Garroute, John Graybill, and William Punches, were convicted of numerous fish and game violations stemming from a hunting trip in the vicinity of Illiamna. On appeal, defendants jointly challenge their convictions on several grounds; Graybill, separately contends that his sentence is excessive. We conclude that the issues jointly raised by defendants can be disposed of summarily. 1 However, Graybill’s contention that the sentence imposed by Judge Andrews was excessive requires more extensive consideration.

Defendants are Anchorage residents who flew…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WorthamAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Donlun v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Alvarado v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Tookak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  5. Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GraybillAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  4. Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  5. Maeckle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API