Legal Opinion

Arthur J. Goldberg, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Patrick Ross, Individually and D/B/A Patrick Ross Company

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 12, 1962No. 5917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

For some eight years, seemingly even after the issuance of a permanent injunction by consent, appellee repeatedly violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. A year following the last discovered violation appellee moved in the district court to have the injunction “cancelled” on the ground that it was a restriction on its business, which it described as highly competitive. The court, having found without any basis except talk that the injunction caused appellee “irreparable damage,” and having found no change in circumstances in appellee’s methods of operation, granted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. L. Metcalfe Walling, Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division, Etc. v. Harnischfeger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gloria Brooks, an Infant, by Ethel A. Brooks, Her Mother and Next Friend v. County School Board of Arlington County, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  2. Bouterie v. KleinpeterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Wirtz v. Graham Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, U. S. Dept. Of Labor v. Thor, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  5. Holiday Inns, Inc. v. Holiday Inn v. Strand Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API