Wirtz v. Graham Transfer & Storage Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISDOM, Circuit Judge.
The question for decision in each of these four appeals is whether a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from violating the Fair Labor Standards Act should be vacated. In each case the defendant has observed the law since the issuance of the injunction, but has not shown any special hardship or new or changed conditions not readily foreseeable at the time the decree was entered. We hold that when an injunction is issued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, “[n]othing less than a clear showing of grievous wrong evoked by new and unforeseen conditions” is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mitchell v. PidcockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Goldberg v. CockrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Swift & CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1960
- L. Metcalfe Walling, Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division, Etc. v. Harnischfeger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- John T. Dunlop, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Wayne DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Atlas Roofing Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,701 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Advance Growth Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. John E. WorthenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Usery v. Golden Gem Growers, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.