Legal Opinion

Santillan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Fresno

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 2008No. B194219Published

1Opinion of the Court

163 Cal.App.4th 4 (2008)

GEORGE SANTILLAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF FRESNO, Defendant and Respondent.

No. B194219.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Eight.

May 21, 2008.

Arkin & Glovsky, Sharon J. Arkin; Kiesel, Boucher & Larson, Raymond P. Boucher, Patrick DeBlase, Anthony M. DeMarco; The Drivon Law Firm, Lawrence Drivon and David Drivon for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Stammer, McKnight, Barnum & Bailey, Carey H. Johnson and Aimee E. Rainwater for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

RUBIN, J.—

Plaintiffs George and Howard Santillan appeal from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Doe v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API