Foley v. Bullard
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action to foreclose the lien of a street assess*» ment.
*517The contract was awarded to Warren and Mal ley, who on December 26, 1889, assigned the same to Foley and Keenan, by whom the work was performed. The warrant and assessment were issued to Warren and Halley December 23, 1890, and delivered to Foley and Keenan. Foley and Keenan had assigned the contract to Lang and Buggies June 2, 1890, as security for a loan of money then obtained from them, with which to complete the contract. The demand was made on the 24th of December, 1890, by John T. Foley, the son of the plaintiff, who in his return…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Whiting v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Gaffney v. GoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Perez-CervantesWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. FrostWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. FrostWashington Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.