Legal Opinion

Dey v. Prentiss

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Allegany county court. Action by Samuel G. Dey against Minnie Prentiss to recover the amount expended by plaintiff in building defendant’s portion of a division fence. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of defendant, rendered by the direction of the court, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made on the minutes, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

This action was brought to recover pay for building the defendant’s portion of a division fence between the lands of the parties, situate in the town of Hume, Allegany county. It was originally tried in a" justice court, where the plaintiff had a verdict. The defendant appealed, and the case was tried in the county court, where a verdict was directed for the defendant, of no cause of action.

It is alleged in the plaintiff’s complaint that the parties owned adjoining lands; that they agreed, upon the portion of the line fence between them lands which each should build; that the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aikin v. Albany, Vermont & Canada RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Countryman v. DeckNew York Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. 300 Broadway Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Greenfarb v. R. S. K. Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. In Re 523 East Fifth Street Housing Preservation Development Fund Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  4. Arroyo v. RosenbluthCivil Court of the City of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API