Legal Opinion

Barham v. Nowell

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1962No. 42185PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillespie, J.

Paul Nowell, plaintiff below and appellee here, sued Mrs. Ruth M. Barham, defendant below and appellant here, in damages for personal injuries sustained by appellee in a collision between the motorcycle appellee was riding and an automobile operated by appellant. The parties were traveling at right angles to each other and collided in an intersection controlled by an overhead electric street signal. The negligence charged was failing to stop for the red signal light, excessive speed, and failure to keep a lookout. The evidence was highly conflicting and the jury could have resolved the issues…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. BOLLISMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. WrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  3. THOMAS v. FlemingMississippi Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wells v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mills v. NicholsMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Trapp v. CaysonMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Jesco, Inc. v. ShannonMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Couch v. CITY OF D'IBERVILLE, MISS.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API