State v. Kuchera
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
In State v. Artwell, 177 N.J. 526, 832 A.2d 295 (2003), this Court considered the related questions of whether witnesses tendered by the defense in a criminal case could be required to appear either in restraints or in prison garb. In respect of the former, this Court determined that “[b]ecause the appearance of a defense witness in restraints presents a risk of unfair prejudice to a defendant, the trial court may subject a witness to physical restraint only when it has reason to believe it is necessary to maintain the security of the courtroom.” Id. at 537, 832 A.2d 295 (citation and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- State v. CastagnaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- State v. R.B.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- State v. CookSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State of West Virginia v. Daniel L. HerbertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. DockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- State of New Jersey v. Wedpens DorsainvilNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
- Carney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.