Legal Opinion
Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 10, 1983No. 82 Civ. 5182(MP)PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILTON POLLACK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Moss, who seeks to represent the class of all those who sold shares of Deseret Pharmaceutical Company stock on November 30, 1976, brings this suit for damages against Newman, Courtois and Antoniu and Morgan Stanley in the wake of Newman’s conviction for securities fraud and mail fraud in connection with a tender offer made for Deseret stock. Moss asserts claims against Newman, Courtois and Antoniu based on Sections 10(b) and 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Rules promulgated thereunder, Rule 10b-5 and Rule 14e-3. In addition,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Michael E. Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., E. Jacques Courtois, Jr., Adrian Antoniu, and James M. Newman, Morgan Stanley Inc. And James M. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Anthony IndelicatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Bankers Trust Co. v. RhoadesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Hokama v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1983
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.