Legal Opinion

Needles v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 9, 1963No. 49336Published

1Opinion of the Court

371 S.W.2d 300 (1963)

Enoch R. NEEDLES, Ruben N. Bergendoff, Ellis E. Paul, Theodore J. Cambern, Josef Sorkin, James P. Exum, Elmer K. Timby, and Carl L. Erb, partners, doing business as Howard, Needles, Tammen & Bergendoff, Appellants,

v.

KANSAS CITY, Missouri, a municipal corporation, Respondent.

No. 49336.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2.

September 9, 1963.

Motion for Rehearing or to Transfer Denied October 14, 1963.

Clyde J. Linde, Billy S. Sparks, Kansas City (Linde, Thomson, VanDyke, Fairchild & Langworthy, Kansas City, of counsel), for appellants.

Keith Wilson, Jr., City Counselor,…

Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Laughlin v. Boatmen's National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. Kansas City v. RathfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  4. Fulton v. City of LockwoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. Burger v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API