Legal Opinion

People v. Olsen

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1905No. Crim. No. 3PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County and from an order denying a new trial. E. C. Hart, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuckles, J.

Defendant was informed against by the district attorney of the county of Sacramento for the crime of murder, alleged to have been committed in the city of Sacramento on the sixth day of February, 1904, by killing one Henry Salt. He was tried, found guilty of murder in the first degree, with punishment fixed for life in the state prison. Appeal is from the judgment and order overruling his motion for a new trial.

During the examination of the jurors on their voir dire, and after six persons had been accepted and sworn to try the case, and while the examination of juror Campbell was progressing,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. UrquidasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. People v. Fong ChingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MarrenIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  2. People v. SampoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. State v. MahoneyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Bowen v. Sierra Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Brown v. Van's International Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API