Legal Opinion

Bourassa v. ATO CORP.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1982No. Docket 49615PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal by leave granted an order of summary judgment dismissing their complaint against defendant ATO Corporation (ATO) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. GCR 1963, 117.2(1). We affirm.

Plaintiff Robert J. Bourassa, an employee of Safeway Scaffolding, a division of ATO, was injured when he fell from scaffolding he was erecting on the premises of defendant Great Lakes Steel Corporation. Defendant ATO is in the business of manufacturing scaffolding. Bourassa’s duties included erecting the scaffolding for ATO. Indeed, plaintiffs’ counsel admitted at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neal v. Roura Iron Works, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Lone v. Esco Elevators, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Peoples v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Beardslee v. Michigan Claim Services, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Haddad v. JusticeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Beauchamp v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Kahn v. BurmanDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  4. Genson v. Bofors-Lakeway, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Burgess v. Holloway Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API