Legal Opinion

Finstrom v. First State Bank of Buxton

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1994No. Civ. 940189PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

Melvin Finstrom appeals from summary judgment dismissing his claims for royalties and damages stemming from the sale of gravel originally removed from his land. We reverse and remand.

The facts as alleged in the pleadings are complex. Because this is an appeal from summary judgment, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment is sought, in this case, Finstrom. Binstock v. Tschider, 374 N.W.2d 81, 83 (N.D.1985). The record indicates that Finstrom owned a parcel of land containing gravel deposits. In .1979 he entered into a lease…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carter v. StantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Binstock v. TschiderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Herzog v. YuillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Titus v. TitusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Superior Oil Co. v. Devon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ritter, Laber & Associates, Inc. v. Koch Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Moen v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Abel v. AllenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Rolla v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Slawson Exploration Co., Inc. v. Nine Point Energy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API