Legal Opinion

Cardinal Film Corp. v. Beck

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 1, 1918PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Equity. Bill by the Cardinal Film Corporation against Fred Beck and others. Decree for complainant.

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.

If the complainant has a valid copyright of the motion picture play, “Joan the Woman,” it has been infringed by the defendants. The defendants, however, argue that the copyright was invalid because there was no publication before the deposit of copies of the motion picture photoplay in the office of the librarian of Congress. This defense has been considered before -by Judge Fearned Hand in the case of Stern v. Jerome H. Remick (C. C.) 175 Fed. 282, where the court said that no publication was necessary other than the deposit in the Fibrary of Congress. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jewelers' Mercantile Agency v. Jewelers' Weekly Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Wright v. EisleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Stern v. Jerome H. Remick & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1910

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Roy Export Company Establishment Of Vaduz, Liechtenstein v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Sidney Hirshon v. United Artists CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Patterson v. Century Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. American Visuals Corporation v. Frederick A. Holland and Sam SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  5. American Vitagraph, Inc. A Corporation, Lloyd v. Friedgen, Jr., and William J. Gleason v. Ronald R. Levy, M.D. And Cinamco, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API