Legal Opinion

Wright v. Eisle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Frank M. Wright, from a judgment of the County Court of Westchester county in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 16th day of June, 1902, upon the dismissal of the complaint .by •direction of the court after a trial at the Westchester Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J. :

The plaintiff is an architect. In the early part: of 1900. he prepared plans and specifications for a residence for one William T. *357Litson, and these plans and specifications were duly filed with the building department of the city of Mount Vernon. The residence was constructed, and appears to have pleased the fancy of the defendant, who went to the plaintiff and asked him how much it would cost for a duplicate of these plans and specifications, and upon the plaintiff naming a figure the defendant told him he could get the same work for less money. The negotiation ended here^…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Palmer v. . De WittNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Jewelers' Mercantile Agency v. Jewelers' Weekly Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. DeSilva Construction Corp. v. HerraldDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1962
  2. Smith v. PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Continental Casualty Company v. BeardsleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. Kurfiss v. CowherdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Read v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API