National Life & Accident Insurance v. Davison
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). It is undisputed that Sadie Davison was in no way related to the insured, nor did she have an insurable interest in her life as the court told the jury. It is likewise undisputed that the insured, Lucy Mitchell, was suffering from heart disease and dropsy and not in sound health on the day of the application, nor on the date of the-issuance of the policy, and that the policy was never delivered to Lucy Mitchell.
It is insisted that, because of the provision in the application that “no obligation shall exist against the company unless the policy of insurance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Planters' Mutual Insurance v. LoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
- Souza v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Sadler v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Jenkins v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- American Insurance v. HamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. HensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- The National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Union Life Insurance Company v. BolinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Clark v. FreelingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Sligh v. PlairSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978