Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sligh v. Plair

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 10, 1978No. 77-116Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

The petition of the intervenor-appellee Plair was granted by the chancery court and title to the disputed land vested in him. Plair’s intervention alleged that he had previously had no information that Beulah Sligh had mortgaged the land conveyed by Plair to his daughter Beulah and her bodily heirs. There is evidence to sustain this allegation which the chancellor obviously believed. It is not contradicted. The majority ignores this fact. This fact necessarily had a significant bearing on the trial court’s holding, since appellant Pine Bluff Production Credit Association pleaded waiver and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ray Dodge, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. NewsomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Ritchie v. Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  4. Moss v. ChappellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Christmas v. RaleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API