Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Coffman v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2006No. 2005-0851PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Appellant, Lincoln Electric Company, appeals from a decision of the Tenth District Court of Appeals that ordered appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio to vacate its determination that Lincoln had not committed a violation of a specific safety requirement (“VSSR”). We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

{¶ 2} Lincoln Electric Company built wélding machines. During the final inspection process, each machine was connected to a live power source for testing. The power was transmitted from a testing panel by three wire leads that were attached to the machine with alligator clips.

{¶…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Frank Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Richmond v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State Ex Rel. International Truck & Engine Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Amanda Bent Bolt Co. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State ex rel. Ohio Paperboard v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API