Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Willis

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1986Published

1DissentStephens, Chief Justice

What the majority of this Court has wrought in this case is the substantial watering down of one of our most traditional constitutional protections afforded our citizens — the right of an accused at his criminal trial to have a personal confrontation, before a jury of his peers, with his accuser. The majority has put the imprimatur of this Court on a new revision of the rule which says that the right of confrontation is no longer “face to face”, but is rather, “face— to television screen — to face”.

Because of occasional problems with the testimony of alleged young victims in child abuse…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. People v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Harris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  4. Flatt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API