Gasquet v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the first judicial district. Suit, by attachment, was brought against the defendant, a merchant at Nashville, as drawer of a bill of exchange on a merchant of the latter place, and returned under protest for non acceptance.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the first judicial district. Suit, by attachment, was brought against the defendant, a merchant at Nashville, as drawer of a bill of exchange on a merchant of the latter place, and returned under protest for non acceptance. Several other creditors af-terwards, brought suit, and the writs of attachment were levied on the same property that had been previously attached by W. A. Gasquet and Co. After the cause, which had already been before this court, was remanded, (see vol. 8, n. s. p. 544,) the attorney appointed to represent the defendant, filed a general denial. jn the originai…
1Opinion of the CourtMathews, J.
This suit is by attachment, and brought on a protested bill of exchange which *430was drawn by the defendant, Johnson, in favor of the plaintiffs on Kyle and Orr of ]>fash ville, Tennessee. Judgment was ren-4ere¿ jn t}le court below for the plaintiffs, from which the defendants appealed.
The cause was one previous to the present appeal before this court. The judgment of the district court was then reversed, and the ease remanded to be tried de novo.
The evidence on which the last judgment has been rendered in the court below, is fully spread on the record, to the admissibility of which several…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. Jefferson Island Salt Mining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Lewis v. HarwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Moreland v. Monarch Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.