Legal Opinion

Hazel Sutton, Kenneth Holland, Edith Odom, and Kevin Qualls v. Jimmy M. Evans, John H. Burke, Jr., Jimmy P. Rice, and William T. Tucker

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 8, 1990No. 89-6455PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), defendants-appellants Jimmy Evans, John Burke, Jimmy Rice, and William Tucker appeal from a preliminary injunction entered by the district court requiring the defendants to pay plaintiffs-appellees Hazel Sutton, Kenneth Holland, Edith Odom, and Kevin Qualls supplemental compensation upon their transfer to new work stations pending a final determination on the merits in an action to enjoin the defendants from transferring the plaintiffs. Because the injunction violates the Eleventh Amendment, we vacate the district court’s order…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Larry T. Wilson, Cross-Appellant v. Thomas L. Beebe, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Harry Whitney Cross-Appellants v. Robert Brown Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Bayshore Associates, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. Barachkov v. 41B District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. T.M. v. Richard DeWineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  4. Michigan Road Builders Ass'n, Inc. v. BlanchardDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1991
  5. Michigan Coalition of Radioactive Materials Users v. GriepentrogDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API