Legal Opinion

Pendo v. Beakey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Lawrence county. Hon. Joseph B. Moore, Judge. Action by Raffaelo M. Pendo and another against Edward H. 'Beakey for the recovery of certain real property. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an action to recover a small tract of land— less than one acre — in the westerly part of Lead City. The verdict and judgment were in favor of the plaintiffs, and the defendant appeals. The plaintiffs claim to recover the premises by virtue of prior actual possession.

Before proceeding to discuss the merits, we will notice a preliminary question. It is suggested on the part of the respondents that the questions presented by the appellant cannot be considered by this court for the reason that the notice of intention to move for a new trial does not specify the errors of law relied on.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Deffeback v. HawkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Sabariego v. MaverickSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Wilson v. PalmerTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Bell v. LongworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  5. M'Call v. NeelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bosworth v. HagertySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Ensley v. CoolbaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Pendo v. BlytheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API