Legal Opinion

Brown v. Armfield

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1900No. 19,282PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From tbe Headricks Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

— The only error assigned and not waived is that the court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial. All the causes assigned for a new trial depend for their determination upon the evidence.

Appellants (under §661 Burns 1894, §649 R. S. 1881 and Horner 1897) directed the clerk “to prepare and certify full, true, and complete transcript of the proceedings, and of the following papers, to wit, original complaint, third paragraph of complaint as amended, motion to make third paragraph of complaint more specific, demrirrers to each paragraph of complaint, answer and cross-complaint,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reid v. HoustonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Allen v. GavinIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Chestnut v. Southern Indiana Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Workman v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Smith v. SwitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Chappell v. Jasper County Oil & Gas Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API