Legal Opinion

Portnoy v. Hill

Binghamton City Court

Decided October 10, 1968PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter T. Gormar, J.

This action for summary proceedings was commenced by the petitioner, Lillian Portnoy, the owner and landlord of 72 Susquehanna Street, Binghamton, New York. The respondent in the action is Sandra Hill, an occupant of the Susquehanna Street premises, and referred to as the tenant. Similar proceedings have been instituted against two other tenants, Bonnie Monta and Lily Bradley, but by means of a stipulation have been consolidated with the action now before this court.

The landlord bases her action on the fact that she gave the tenant the required statutory 30-day notice (Real Property Law, §…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Dockery v. Lampart Table Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Mobil Oil Corp. v. RubenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Hosey v. Club Van CortlandtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API