Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Peak v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 25, 1957No. 491Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mr. Justice Harlan> whom Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice Burton join,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Petitioner sues to recover death benefits under a National Service Life Insurance Policy on the life of her son, a draftee in the United States Army. The case is before us only on the complaint, whose substantial allegations are these: The insured disappeared from his post in the Army on or about July 30, 1943, and has not been heard of since. At the time of his disappearance, for some time before, and continuously thereafter until his death, the insured suffered from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Unexcelled Chemical Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Davie v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. M'iver, Lessees v. RaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1817

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API