Legal Opinion

Spillane v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 31, 2003No. 03 C 1989PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GUZMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, John and Karri Spillane and Scott and Cherilyn Rutledge, have brought suit alleging violation of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901-6987 (2008), against defendants Commonwealth Edison Company and Northern Illinois Gas Company. Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), urging the Court to abstain from exercising jurisdiction under either the Burford or Colorado abstention doctrines, or in the alternative, under the primary jurisdiction doctrine.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adkins v. VIM Recycling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Litgo New Jersey Inc. v. Commissioner New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  3. Interfaith Community Organization Inc. v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
  4. San Francisco Herring Ass'n v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. Tilot Oil, LLC v. BP Products North America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API