Glasgow v. Moore
Supreme Court of Missouri
ERROR to Chariton Circuit Court, I The verdict was clearly contrary to the evidence. The account of the plaintiffs was fully proved, and the only evidence on the part of the defendants, was the testimony of Applegate in relation to the rate of exchange.
Read the full summary
ERROR to Chariton Circuit Court, I The verdict was clearly contrary to the evidence. The account of the plaintiffs was fully proved, and the only evidence on the part of the defendants, was the testimony of Applegate in relation to the rate of exchange. Admitting the rate of exchange to have been as stated by this witness, still there was a balance due to plaintiffs. 1. Plaintiffs in error cannot object in this court to any proceedings in the circuit court, unless the objections were made, and exceptions saved in the ciruit court. 2. All the evidence offered by plaintiffs in the circuit…
1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.
The plaintiffs brought their action of assumpsit in the circuit court of Chariton county against the defendants, who pleaded non-assumpsit, and gave notice of a set off under the statute.
From the evidence in the cause, as preserved by the bill of exceptions, it appears that Moore & Feazel were largely engaged in Chariton county in the purchase of tobacco, and preparing it for the European markets. Glasgow & Harrison were merchants in St. Louis, and undertook the agency of shipment and sale of the tobacco in Europe, for which service and advancements made on account of the tobacco consigned to…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Blackmon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- State v. . PetersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Hereford v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Elton Ray Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Ex Parte MetcalfCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.