Legal Opinion

Neeley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 1987No. 85-2839PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant claims that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure without an evidentiary hearing.

Appellant contends that the trial court’s examination of the transcript of the change-of-plea hearing did not furnish an adequate basis to determine whether his plea was induced by an improper promise or misunderstanding. Nor did it establish whether the defendant was still under the influence of withdrawal from heavy psychotropic medication and therefore unable to make a rational decision regarding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ream v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Chapman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Schenck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API